|
about
this web page?
This
is not going to be a web site that is maintained as such. What I have
put here is only to stake my claim to founding
'Bohemian Postmodernism'
(very different to Postmodern Bohemian). I cordially invite any fellow
artists to contact me if they feel there is something here that inspires
them or that I might like to see. As a strong proponent of synchronicity
I expect these values to pop-up all over the globe anytime now.
My views on 'digital art' are now pretty well documented elsewhere, so
only a little more here. Lest to say I have found (in 16years) nothing
of any lasting value in it (especially my 1000's of images). Techno mulch
which alas' when all added up isn't worth a simple 10minute watercolour.
I have no idea why, or why the medium is of no lasting value or addresses
any artistic enquiry. It has however been of incalculable value as a bridge
across the void of visual possibilities. The grass certainly isn't greener
on the other side. In fact the very qualities of grass (other than being
green) had been totally overlooked. Virtual grass is only green!
My email address is on the main site, I get enough spam as it is from
trawling and phishing. And I know you are more than smart enough to figure
it out!
Cheers pbg
|
Bohemian
Postmodernist Manifesto (PBG 5 July 2006)
It is the purpose of this art
to engage the artist and the viewer in the single act of human discovery.
To make solid, using the body of the artist, a representation of an emotion
or sensory experience that can be fixed or observed by others without
the need for any technological device.
Art should encompass only experiences and emotions. Technologies work
to enhance and amplify our natural instincts and emotions. It is these
that all art plays to. Referencing 'signifiers' in media as metaphors,
adjectives and reference points is an inevitable form of expression in
artist endeavours.
Art should not present just the
doctrine of philosophic or scientific thought but must engage and embrace
the emotional and aesthetic consciousness of the viewer. Digital or technologically
created imagery is not in itself a true description of either an idea,
event or aspiration. All art must contain direct physical marks made by
the artist.
In this art any technology may
be used, references to ideas and beliefs encapsulated in abstract form
can be included. All work must culminate in the direct hand of the artist.
The subject must be a result of emotional psychological enquiry and no
cultural ideas can be included as 'ideals'. Truth to a genuine human response
is the only meaning, and the representation of this response is the only
motif.
Basic premise: We are only truly interested in ourselves. The physical world is merely a resource to be exploited by the human. We are consciously and subconsciously aware of this and an empathetic conflict is created. We take maximum advantage of the skills we have acquired. These cognitive skills have brought us to a crisis with the natural world. Our instincts are our greatest asset and our ultimate weakness. We need to understand ourselves and be prepared to face all fears and taboos.The challenge is to find out what we really are, using any device at our disposal. But truth and honesty are the only tools we can use to reveal the self, no matter how painful the discoveries prove to be.
This art challenges our desire to blank out what we feel everyday. To make visible the feelings and instincts that we all share. To show what does make an impact and describe it without meretricious representation or correctness.
It is no longer technology's task to better harness the world. It is technology's task to aid us to understand ourselves, and therefore minimise the 'tragedy' that we are. Art shows us these discoveries, from the hand of a fellow human.
|
| |
ARTIST'S STATEMENT
I can only see fragments
of the natural world, very little of it still exists. Unlike other animals
we do not just pass through our environment, we construct or modify it
to fit our tastes or purpose.
The world is a construction. A series of elements arranged by man. A hereditary
construct of practical or aesthetic design.
When, for example, I see the image of someone sitting in a room, they
are not just passing through or amongst a series of objects or arrangements.
It is a construction, a partnership between the sitter and the space;
an active interaction and a considered position. What is going on? What
need is being served, experienced, enjoyed or re-assessed? As the sitter
actively engages with the space how is the 'engine' of consciousness being
controlled? What stresses, forces and desires are being encountered?
Outside people mix and
mingle, act, interact and modify every situation and environment they
occupy.
I want to observe, identify and record; make it clear through whatever
medium or discipline examples of the building blocks of this conscious
interaction.
"This is not a treatise
but a dictionary."
The natural world is now little more than a romantic ideal, it no longer
exists. We have: been, changed and left our mark on it all.
The world is a construction of our desire. Our desire a construction of
our evolution. Our evolution a construction of our consciousness. Our
consciousness a construction of
what exactly?
Paul Birkeland-Green
2006
|